LeftyToker
Registered on
Jan-21-2003
More User Info
|
Message #113164 posted by LeftyToker (Info) March 09, 2008 05:33:57 ET
In Reply to: America Will Not be Defeated posted by Torog (Info) March 08, 2008 06:00:10 ET
..
.I hope no one will be suprized by my critique of this article./?/
..I took the time to read the article, twice.
..and I read it a third time, to consider what David Bellavia was trying to say.
.
..I respect and appreciate people who choose to be emplo yed, and/or deployed
in military service.
.When a person joins the military, they must be trained.
..Submit to authority
..Obey commands.
..Carry out/expidite orders.
.
.. a soldier believes what he/she is told.
.A soldiers intentions are always honorable because they serve their country.
.A soldiers mission is only as honorable as the intentions of the commanders.
..David Bellavia has no conception of why he thinks what he says?
,,(in fact, David Bellavia is probably paid to write these strange items?)
..WHY would David Bellavia write things like:
" As the lone ambassadors of America's Warrior Class.."
...WHAT?..."America's Warrior Class"..Is this a new "class"?
..are we all supposed to know about it?
How many "upper class", are in "America's Warrior Class"?
"...we feel strongly that, as long as there is a debate taking place on the merits of the conflicts in which we continue to fight and bleed, we will not only participate, we will lead that debate. No one is more qualified or more deserving of t h at distinction than those brave souls who have continued to re-enlist, tour after tour, to defend our freedoms."
..I feel strongly,
that as long as you have no questions, or debate concerning the merits or logic of that statement,
and this article,,,you should continue to wave the Chinese made US flag,
and support whatever or anything the 'troops' are doing.
...Bottom Line:
..Aint NO fuckin' question about "supporting the troops"..!
..The troops are not the ones who chose to go where they are at!
...W hy dont we see bumper stickers saying "support the war"
?.,."SUPPORT THE INVASION"...
"SUPPORT THE OCCUPATION".
seriously,
..think about it:
.The honorable intentions of Soldiers is not a valid question!
.Soldiers serve their commanders, and Soldier s ar e not involved
in the decisions, or reasons for the orders they are required
to follow.
Is this article sensible, and logical?.
....then maybe this is too?: .ˆ¥ç√ˆ¨˜…øˆ≈•©∫ø¬•ºªµ…πˆø擪ø≈
ˇ¶∂•¶©ˆ¶¨∆˜ª•ßª•¶˙º•ˆ≤˚檺øƒ•ºª∆•µ“–ºª¥©ºªµ˚æ– ªºƒ®º•ªæ ƒ©º•ª ∆ºªæ–ªº∆µ˚“º•ª˙
πππππππππππ𥩨√ ¨†¥ ç e
|
