bum
Premier Member
Registered on
Mar-04-2001
More User Info
|
Message #173572 posted by bum (Info) March 24, 2008 11:58:24 ET
In Reply to: Re: happy easter posted by infertile (Info) March 24, 2008 10:08:53 ET
DB, i think you've missed the point of the question... you said you'd worry
about birds after the human condition improves... working upon that
premise, wouldn't it make sense that you can do both at the same time
considering a diet change is a simple matter that requires little time?
"If the recommendations that you prescribe for animals were actually
implemented, the cost for food, not just meat, but veggies too, would further
skyrocket causing even more human misery."
i see your reasoning and i don't disagree with it DB, human suffering is more
important than animal suffering. again, i agree, but again, you don't seem to
desire to entertain any idea of a way around it. there are plenty of ways to
prevent starvation right now that aren't being made use of, so i don't believe
animal torture in the name of food to eat is a valid argument.
anyway, yes, the cause of meat would rise... but why would veggies?
and thank you for your prediction, i hope it comes true.
|
